PDA

You are currently viewing a search engine-friendly (archive) version of this page.

View Full Version : Intel: One step closer to 10GHz


Techguy
March 8, 2001, 10:00 pm
Intel: One step closer to 10GHz

By John G. Spooner
ZDNet News
March 8, 2001 12:50 PM PT

Intel passed another milestone this week in the development of a key technology for creating processors that run more than five times faster than current chips.
The chipmaker announced Thursday that it has delivered the first standard-format photomasks for use with Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. The technology is designed to allow chipmakers to embed ever smaller features on silicon, beginning with chips at the 70-nanometer level. Current processors are manufactured on a 180 nanometer micron process. Smaller features mean more transistors can be squeezed onto smaller pieces of silicon, making for greater computing power.

Because of EUV's relatively smooth road to development, most industry experts believe the technology will succeed today's Deep Ultraviolet (DUV) lithography as the technique used to manufacture chips running at speeds of 10GHz or more.

These new photomasks are critical to the success of EUV because they represent the technology necessary to use ultraviolet light to draw features on silicon wafers during the chip manufacturing process.

DUV lithography uses light with a wavelength of 248 nanometers that passes through the photomask, printing an image of the chip on silicon. But because most materials absorb UV light, researchers needed to come up with materials that reflect the wavelength of light (13 nanometers) used by EUV. The new EUV photomasks developed by Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) do so, making their delivery the next milestone in the development of EUV, Intel executives said.

"The reason this is a milestone is that photomasks that are used today are transmitted-light photomasks," said Curt Jackson, group leader for Intel's Advanced Resist Group.

Instead of transmitting light through the mask, as is done in current chip manufacturing, EUV uses its masks to reflect the ultraviolet light on to the wafer. To accomplish this, Intel and EUV LLC, a consortium charged with developing EUV technology, had to develop special coatings. The coatings consist of several layers of molybendium silicide, a mixture of molybendium and silicon.

Intel executives said that despite requiring the new molybdenum silicide coating, EUV photomasks will be able to use most of the same manufacturing tools as used in its current chipmaking facilities, saving time and development costs.

"Intel has shown that we can pattern EUV photomasks on a substrate that is similar to what we use today," Jackson said.

The masks, which were delivered to EUV LLC early in the year, will be used in the EUV Engineering Test Stand, the prototype EUV chipmaking machine, to print the first images on a silicon wafer using the process.

EUV LLC is a consortium including Intel, Advanced Micro Devices, Motorola, Micron Technologies, Infineon and the federal Sandia and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories. Most recently, IBM joined the group.

The 6-inch-square, 0.25-inch-thick masks include 200-nanometer features, which are reduced by a factor of four to print 50-nanometer features on the silicon wafer.

Intel's next goal is to develop masks that harbor 120-nanometer features and therefore can print 30-nanometer features on silicon.

Chips with 30-nanometer features are four generations ahead of the 130-nanometer manufacturing process Intel plans to launch later this year.

ZDNET

------------------
Remember to refer a friend to our site

Shadowhawke
March 9, 2001, 11:21 am
So does this mean my new 1gig machine will be obsolete in even less time than normal?

------------------
The Shadowhawke AD&D Grand Master (http://pub16.ezboard.com/badvanceddugeonsanddragons) and SAF Gaming forum Moderator. (http://www.suggestafix.com/cgi-bin/ubb/forumdisplay.cgi?action=topics&forum=Gaming&number=29&DaysPrune=30&LastLogin=)
Sometimes, no matter what you do, the Dragon wins.

gotovegasboy
March 9, 2001, 12:26 pm
Yes, apparently 5 times as fast as normal!

http://www.helpfromtechs.com/ubb/smilies/rolleyes.gifMy two cents: This race for the fastest processor is all well and good for the industry, but it is kinda screwin' with us consumers' heads! My 350 AMD does just great, and I feel no need to run right out and spend top dollar on the latest thing.

That article was amazing, though...how small will things get??!
Originally posted by Shadowhawke:
So does this mean my new 1gig machine will be obsolete in even less time than normal?





------------------

Coffee Pom
March 9, 2001, 11:46 pm
My two cents: This race for the fastest processor is all well and good for the industry, but it is kinda screwin' with us consumers' heads! My 350 AMD does just great, and I feel no need to run right out and spend top dollar on the latest thing.


I bought my 500mhz machine two years ago, and for the first time today, i found a game that i couldn't buy for it. "Alice" requires a 500mhz machine with 32 megs of video RAM. I'm working with 11 megs. Sheesh!

------------------

peepers
March 10, 2001, 01:03 am
We'll just have to wait and see how this actually hits the market. If it's anything like the P4's I don't want one. To get the 1.5Ghz. and 400Mhz fsb to work, they hosed the L1 cache down to a teeny 8K which is why the P4 is beaten by the P3 on benchmarks, especially in office programs. It sounds to me like they wanted to push out bigger MHz numbers without worrying about actual performance.

------------------

Dogg of Demise
March 10, 2001, 02:15 am
I realy don't think the jump from 400 mhz to 1 ghz has made anywhere near as much difference as faster hard drives and cheap ram!

------------------


<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">This message has been edited by Dogg of Demise on March 09, 2001 at 11:16 PM</font>

ttvp
March 11, 2001, 12:48 am
Originally posted by Coffee Pom:
I bought my 500mhz machine two years ago, and for the first time today, i found a game that i couldn't buy for it. "Alice" requires a 500mhz machine with 32 megs of video RAM. I'm working with 11 megs. Sheesh!



I'm pretty sure Alice only requires 300 MHz and...less than that in the video RAM dept. I have the demo and I can run it smoothly and I have a PIII 550 with (well, whaddya know?) 32 megs of video RAM. If those were the minimum requirements, I couldn't even play it. Period. You were probably looking at the Recommended (sp?) system stats.

------------------
The PA Gaming Zone. Come. Post. Have a cup of coffee. Enjoy yourself. (http://pub49.ezboard.com/bpagamingzone)

Jaturp
March 11, 2001, 01:41 am
I have to agree with dogg. Couple that with a higher rated PS and improved cooling, and the lower MHz units outperform thier big brothers.JT.

------------------

Coffee Pom
March 11, 2001, 08:16 am
To get the 1.5Ghz. and 400Mhz fsb to work, they hosed the L1 cache down to a teeny 8K which is why the P4 is beaten by the P3 on benchmarks, especially in office programs.

I didn't know that. I was lusting over the new 1.5Ghz machine last night at Costco, and now i know better. http://www.helpfromtechs.com/ubb/smilies/smile.gif

I'm pretty sure Alice only requires 300 MHz and...less than that in the video RAM dept.

I was referring to the recommended numbers on the box. I've found in the past that the "minimum" numbers mean poor game play. The minimum numbers (on the box and on the website) are 400mhz with 16 Video RAM. Still too high for my system.

Btw, how is the game?

------------------

reddsteel
March 30, 2001, 06:41 pm
I would love to run a computer at that speed!

------------------
Jordan Gadd (reddsteel)
reddsteel@helpfromtechs.com